Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Development Theory 2nd Edition, Jan Nederveen Pieterse

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Development Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mawdsley, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rigg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A survey of the World Development Reports I: discursive strategies

Emma Mawdsley

Department of Geography, University of Durham, UK, e.e.mawdsley{at}durham.ac.uk

Jonathan Rigg

Department of Geography, University of Durham, UK, j.d.rigg{at}durham.ac.uk

This is the first of two surveys of the World Development Report series. Here we focus on the discursive strategies adopted by the Reports. We begin by setting the Reports within the wider milieu of development theory and practice. Behind the pragmatic, problem-solving image that the Reports aim to promote we identify a narrow and pre-framed position that eschews radical or alternative agendas. The Reports engage in numerous discursive ploys to undermine, ignore or manipulate other positions and establish the Reports (and, by extension, the World Bank) as the repository of development ‘common sense’. While the Reports are impressive synthesizing documents, they have lost their ability to play a truly leading role in thinking about development because of their failure to debate alternative positions or fully acknowledge the mistakes of the past.

Key Words: development agendas • discursive strategies • ideology • World Bank • World Development Reports

Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 93-111 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/1464993402ps026ra
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
R. Silvey
Development and geography: anxious times, anemic geographies, and migration
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 507 - 515.
[PDF]

Home page
 Latin American PerspectivesHome page
B. Kohl and L. Farthing
"Less Than Fully Satisfactory Development Outcomes": International Financial Institutions and Social Unrest in Bolivia
Latin American Perspectives, May 1, 2009; 36(3): 59 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. D. Sidaway
Spaces of postdevelopment
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 345 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Progress in Development StudiesHome page
E. Mawdsley and J. Rigg
The World Development Report II: continuity and change in development orthodoxies
Progress in Development Studies, October 1, 2003; 3(4): 271 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Progress in Development StudiesHome page
G. Williams and C. McIlwaine
Entanglements of participation: the theory and practice of attacking poverty
Progress in Development Studies, April 1, 2003; 3(2): 93 - 97.
[PDF]