This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Korf, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Functions of violence revisited: greed, pride and grievance in Sri Lanka’s civil war

Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK

This paper revisits the rationalist conceptions of warlordism in civil wars, which has amounted into the greed hypothesis as opposed to grievance. This argument states that rebels are not motivated to generate public goods - the betterment of society - but seek private gain. Violence becomes a function to generate wealth. While initial studies focused on explaining why civil war breaks out in the first instance, there is now increasing interest in modelling violence and warlordism in ongoing civil war. In this paper, I sketch out and critically discuss the rationalist approaches in this so-called greed-grievance debate and will then concentrate on one particular aspect in the broader greed-grievance literature: the modelling of warlordism in ongoing civil warfare. A contextual model is suggested to explain the dynamics of violence in the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict, which distinguishes extrinsic (‘greed’) and intrinsic (‘pride’) motivations.

Key Words: civil war • greed and grievance • Sri Lanka • war economies

Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 109-122 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1464993406ps131oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?